Nick Freeman is only saying what the majority of people (including) women say in private. Why? because of the insults from feminists and do gooders!
This is only common sense.
Simple question for women. When you go out to a nightclub, why do you dress nice in a fetching dress? why do you use make up? why do you wear nice perfume?
This isn't to make you feel good it's to attract another person, whether same or opposite sex.
You know that if you wear revealing dresses or clothes, you are more likely to attract someone, correct?
So it stands to reason that by dressing provocatively and the more so, you are giving signals of the wrong kind.
This is just common sense.
If woman don't want to cause a problem and have a good time, then it has nothing to do with looking stunning showing a most of your breasts or legs. So dress accordingly and you can still have a good night and not feed any misunderstanding signals.
Just look at the animal world and what they do to attract opposite sex. They use colour or plumage or if an ape, swollen and red backsides etc. It's a fact of life.
So the law should ask who is exploiting who in situations?
And as Mr Freeman says no woman deserves to be raped.
Women who dress prevocatively victimise men, says Mr Loophole
Justin Davenport, Crime Editor14 Jun 2011
Celebrity lawyer Nick Freeman has sparked anger after claiming that women can "victimise" men by dressing in a sexually provocative way.
The 54-year old solicitor, nicknamed Mr Loophole for his success in securing acquittals in motoring cases, said women who wear "racy" red underwear, skimpy tops and fishnet tights and giraffe-necked stilettos conveyed a message that they only had sex on their minds.
He accused those women who insisted they dressed for themselves and not men of lying and urged them to "take more responsibility" when choosing how they act and what to wear.
In a column in a local newspaper, Mr Freeman - whose clients have includedDavid Beckham, Sir Alex Ferguson,model Caprice and snooker champion Ronnie O'Sullivan - said: "As a red-blooded alpha male, let me state unequivocally that I believe how a woman dresses (and behaves in that dress) tells a man what's on her mind.
"I abhor rape and attacks on women and believe me, as a criminal defence lawyer I've been involved with plenty of cases where those who have been dressed in a perfectly conventional way were still victims of this heinous crime.
"I also strongly believe that Yes is Yes and No is No. But in the real world a woman who behaves or dresses in a sexually provocative way conveys a certain message. A message that ironically can victimise men.
"So ladies, when you say you dress for yourselves and not for us males, I don't believe you. It's time to take responsibility for how you act and
what you wear."
what you wear."
Lynn Costello, of Mothers Against Violence, said: "He's talking rubbish."
In his column the lawyer described as "lamentable" last Friday's Slut Walks across Britain in which women wore racy outfits in a protest against a Canadian police chief's warnings about schoolgirls who risk sexual assault by "dressing as sluts".
Mr Freeman told of his own experience as a law student when he ended up in bed with a fellow undergraduate only for her to say No to sex when she revealed that she had a boyfriend.
"I was astonished," said the father of two, who is reported to have split from his wife Stephanie due to his heavy workload. "But mustering every fibre of willpower, I leapt off the bed, pulled on my clothes and made my exit.
"Disappointed? Obviously. But more significantly I was disgusted to have been manipulated and yes victimised. However, both my tender legal training and moral code had blazed inside me. To have ignored her wishes would have been rape. End of career, end of future, end of everything
